VI. CHINESE NEO-COLONIALISM
A. Mutual Unequal
Africa is changing. Sub-Saharan Africa is urbanizing at the world’s fastest rate.173 No issue is more central to the ongoing conversation about Africa’s development than Sino-African relations.174 Given the decades-long slide of economic decline in some African regions, China’s appeal is readily apparent.175 China’s
170 Helal, supra note 166.
171 Id at 51.
172 Ryan, supra note 168, at 288.
173 John Campbell, Africa is the Fastest Urbanizing Place on the Planet, COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, (Sept. 12, 2018), https://www.cfr.org/blog/africa-fastest-urbanizing-place-planet.
174 MUNYARADZI MAWERE & COSTAIN TANDI , “A New Form of Imperialism?” Interrogating China-Africa Relations and Development Prospects in Africa, in DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES FROM THE SOUTH: TROUBLING THE METRICS OF [UNDER-] DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA 393, 393 ( Munyaradzi Mawere ed., 2016).
175 NDUBISI OBIORAH ET. AL., “Peaceful Rise” and Human Rights: China’s Expanding Relations with Nigeria, in CHINA INTO AFRICA: TRADE, AID, AND INFLUENCE 292 (Robert I. Rotberg ed., 2008); see also DAVID SHINN & JOSHUA EISENMAN, A Historical Overview of China-Africa Relations, in CHINA AND AFRICA: A CENTURY OF ENGAGEMENT 17 (2012) (describing that trade was the
supporters claim its interests in Africa are apolitical and businessoriented, with a proven track record of generating economic growth without creating aid dependency. Additionally, some African intellectuals welcome China’s involvement on the continent as a marker heralding a return to a multipolar world in which Africa will have a bigger role to play.176 The reality is that China’s strategy is self-referential and neo-colonial with strategic economic asymmetries and a failure or unwillingness to condemn oppressive African governments.177 In this view, “[t]he interest of China in Africa is highly suspicious … it is a relationship that should be handled with caution especially by the African governments … [because] it mirrors the Euro-African relationship during Europe’s colonial adventures in Africa.”178
Colonialism, in its raw form, is a socio-political ecosystem predicated on the subordination of certain association members while granting the colonizers prerogatives denied to the colonized.179 China continues to benefit more from Africa than Africa does from China. However, it is wrong to say that the evolution of the Sino-Africa relationship is one-way, with passive Africa responding to Chinese overtures. After all, African people and governments initiated contact and sought relations with China before independence.180 Further, post-independence leaders such as Tanzania’s Julius Nyerere and Zambia’s Kenneth Kaunda looked to China as a model for domestic economic nation building.181 In the 1960s and 1970s, China’s relations with African nations were often driven by domestic African considerations, as China fashioned itself for those audiences into a plausible alternative to both the West and
first link between China and Africa. Egypt’s famed Queen Cleopatra reportedly wore silks that probably originated in China.)
176 Obiorah, supra note 175, at 289.
177 Mawere & Tandi, supra note 174, at 393.
178 Id. at 401 (discussing how other scholars hold China’s actions are more altruistic and opine China’s good relations with Africa are the fruit of persuasion rather than the heavy-handed approach of either Western colonialism or Western-directed financial practices).
179 Lea Ypi, What’s Wrong with Colonialism, 41 PHIL. & PUB. AFF. 158, 162 (2013); E. Tendayi Achiume, Migration As Decolonization, 71 STAN. L. REV. 1509, 1534 (2019).
180 Obiorah, supra note 175, at 273.
181 Id.
the Soviet Union.182 In the 1980s, during the waning years of the Cold War, China continued to position itself as an alternative, this time to the “Washington Consensus” and the devastating structural adjustment programs sometimes foisted upon Africa. The SinoAfrica relationship entered a new phase in the 1990s with significant consequences for both sides. China saw Africa as a land of possibility for growing recognition of its status as a global power, while Africa understood China as a wellspring of economic investment.183 In 2000, China and Africa created the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) to serve as a method for promoting cooperation and shared interests.184 That same year, Beijing hosted a ministerial conference, the first of its kind in the history of Sino-Africa relations.185 The conference drew over five thousand attendees and approximately eighty ministers of foreign affairs, international trade, and economic cooperation from fortyfour African countries.186 China’s interest in Africa continued apace; 2006 was dubbed “China’s Year of Africa.”187 Bucking global trends, China took a risk and did not shy away from investment in Africa during the global financial crisis of 2008.188 More recently, Chinese investment in Africa has extended to mergers and acquisitions and to the expansion of Chinese-owned manufacturing operations on the continent.189 Today China’s veneer in Africa wears thin; there is little doubt it is exporting cheap, low grade products to Africa, especially in certain markets like textiles and electronic goods.190
182 Herbert Jauch, *Chinese Investments in Africa: Twenty-First Century Colonialism?, *20 NEW LABOR FORUM 49, 49-55 (2011).
183 Mawere & Tandi, supra note 174, at 400.
184 Uche Ewelukwa Ofodile, Trade, Empires, and Subjects-China-Africa Trade: A New Fair Trade Arrangement, or the Third Scramble for Africa?, 41 VAND. J. TRANSNAT’L. L. 505, 508 (2008)
185 *Id. *
186 Id.
187 Id. at 507.
188 Miria Pigato & Wenxia Tang, China and Africa: Expanding Economic Ties in an Evolving Global Context, WORLD BANK (Mar. 2015), https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/21788/951610W P00PUBL050March01600PUBLIC0.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
189 Id.
190 Mawere & Tandi, supra note 174, at 407.
Africans continue to express a range of reactions to Chinese engagement. Generally, leaders and governments tend to portray Beijing in a positive light and point to tangible improvements in public works projects that benefit ordinary people engaged in daily life.191 After decades of European colonial dominance, followed by more decades of Western aid and investment provided under paternalistic guises, some African leaders have shown appreciation for China’s “no strings attached” approach.192 Recently, China’s socialist market economy, driven by state-owned enterprises, is more brazenly geared toward securing sufficient energy, resources, and minerals to feed its domestic and international industrialization programs.193 In 2008-2009, the African Labor Research Network (ALRN) performed a ten-country study (Angola, Botswana, Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, Namibia, Nigeria, South Africa, Zambia, and Zimbabwe) and found evidence of a neo-colonialist system, whereby China profited to the detriment of African economic systems.194The relationship, which began more egalitarian, is now unequal. For this reason, greater numbers of African workers increasingly refer to “Chinese businesspeople … [as] the new colonizers.”195 Importantly, some African leaders are taking an increasingly pessimistic tone and warn that the unfavorable economic and commercial engagement with China will end badly.196 Michael Sata, the fifth President of Zambia from 2011 to his death in 2014, ran campaigns in 2006 and 2011 focused on the social and economic dangers of African weakness relative to China.197 President Sata’s fears were prescient: Zambia, Africa’s third-largest economy, is currently reeling from extensive Chinese debt, with Beijing playing hardball and looking to restructure agreements that may involve mining assets as collateral.198 One
191 LARRY HANUER & LYLE MORRIS, African Reactions to Chinese Engagement, in CHINESE ENGAGEMENT IN AFRICA: DRIVERS, REACTIONS, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR U.S. POLICY 55 (2014).
192 Id. at 57.
193 Jauch, supra 182.
194 Id.
195 Id.
196 Hanuuer & Morris, supra note 191, at 55.
197 Id.
198 Elliot Smith, Zambia’s spiraling debt offers glimpse into the future of Chinese loan financing in Africa, CNBC (Jan. 14, 2020),
South African commentator who has seen China’s activities on the continent up close thinks China’s primary goal with foreign investment is geopolitical, not economic. The problem is ripe for exploitation because the investments tend to bind African countries politically to China while creating debt obligations and leverage that China can manipulate to force nations to support Chinese global ambitions.199
B. China in Latin America
Modern Latin America is a diverse region, a land of contrasts. Brazil is massive, occupying half the South American continent with a population greater than 200 million.200 Mexico boasts the next highest population at nearly 120 million while Colombia, Argentina, Peru, and Venezuela constitute smaller nations with populations between 30 and 50 million.201 Trade between China and South America is growing exponentially, but this often involves exchanging short-term economic gains for long-term
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/14/zambias-spiraling-debt-and-the-future-ofchinese-loan-financing-in-africa.html. It is noteworthy that in 2017, the Chinese media conglomerate StarTimes funded the creation of a migration to a new digital TV signal and now controls 60% of a joint digital venture with ZNBC. Id.
199 Panos Mourdoukoutas, What China Wants From Africa? Everything, FORBES (May 4, 2019, 9:48 AM), (quoting Ted Bauman, Senior Research Analyst at Banyan Hill Publishing), https://www.forbes.com/sites/panosmourdoukoutas/2019/05/04/what-chinawants-from-africa-everything/#7bb5e070758b .
200 Population, Total - Brazil, THE WORLD BANK, (last visited Feb. 11, 2021), https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=BR.
201 Population, total - Mexico, THE WORLD BANK, (last visited Feb. 11, 2021), https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=MX.; Population, Total - Colombia, *THE WORLD BANK, (last visited Feb. 11, 2021), https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=CO.; *Population, Total - Argentina, *THE WORLD BANK, (last visited Feb. 11, 2021), https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=AR.; *Population, Total - Peru, THE WORLD BANK, (last visited Feb. 11, 2021), https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=PE.; Population, Total- Venezuela, RB, THE WORLD BANK, (last visited Feb. 11, 2021), https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=VE.
dependency.202 Some estimates claim that China will be the dominant trading partner in Latin America by 2050.203 President Xi Jinping indicated that the next step in China’s development is transforming its economy from a labor-intensive export model to one in which medium and high-skill exports are coupled with growing material imports to China’s megacities.204 Latin America is poised to help China pivot away from its current producer-exporter status because its population of nearly 600 million can support economic industrialization and serve as a base for Chinese goods.205 At a meeting between China and 33 members of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC), Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said the region was a natural fit for the BRI, as the U.S. has taken a more proactive stance in the last few years.206 Chile’s Foreign Minister Heraldo Munoz said that China’s relationship with CELAC marks the beginning of a “historic” dialogue that represents a categoric repudiation of protectionism and unilateralism.207 Chinese banks (China Development Bank and China Export-Import Bank) are the largest lenders in Latin America.208 Accumulated loans totaled $137 billion from 2005 to
202 Krishnadev Calamur, Tillerson to Latin America: Beware of China, THE ATLANTIC (Feb. 3, 2018), https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/02/rex-inlatam/552197/.
203 R. Evan Ellis, *The Future of Latin America and the Caribbean in the Context of the Rise of China, *CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, 3, (Nov. 2018). https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fspublic/publication/181119_FutureofLatinAmerica.pdf?fMECdCfwt7zdU7MyR9OFme08CFXWHti.
204Seth Cropsey, “China Sets Its Sights on South America, HUDSON INSTITUTE, (Apr. 9, 2018), https://www.hudson.org/research/14249-china-sets-its-sights-onsouth-america
205*Id. *
206 China Invites Latin America to Take Part in One Belt, One Road, CNBC (Jan. 22, 2018, 9:38 PM), https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/22/china-invites-latinamerica-to-take-part-in-one-belt-one-road.html.
207* Id. *
208 Mark P. Sullivan & Thomas Lum, China’s Engagement with Latin America and the Caribbean, CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE, 2, (last updated Nov. 12, 2020), https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF10982.
2019 with Venezuela, Brazil, Ecuador, and Argentina rounding out the top recipients.209
Positive impacts to some Latin American economies are coming at a prohibitive cost in terms of Chinese neo-colonialist exploitation.”210 For countries like Brazil, a former Portuguese colony, Beijing is an alternative to Washington’s benign neglect but the increase of Chinese manufactured goods in the Brazilian market is concerning to government officials because the real to yuan currency difference makes it more difficult for Brazilian national production to compete with cheaper products from China. China has spent billions of dollars in Latin America in the past fifteen years, mostly in the form of loans to regional governments for a variety of projects.211 Trade between China and Latin America surged from $12 billion in 2000 to almost $306 billion in 2018.212 The loans have transparency issues and have all the appearance of debt traps.213 China’s growing imprimatur on Latin America can be seen in other chilling instances. In Quito, Ecuador, Chinese-made CCTV cameras with facial recognition technology are likely being used for surveillance and intelligence gathering purposes.214 The Venezuelan government now relies on Chinese technology for its “fatherland card,” a type of identity document human rights activists fear will be used to infringe on privacy. Most of all, China’s exploitation of the region’s natural resources is leading to environmental concerns about pollution and harm to residents and livelihoods.215 Chinese companies do not have high environmental standards and labor rights are not considered; “[f]or Chinese companies, the community is not a valid interlocutor, only the government is. The different is
209 Id.
210 Angela Piedad Suárez Torres, China and Latin America, From NeoColonialism to Interdependence? The Case of Brazil, 16 DIMENSIÓN EMPRESARIAL 1, 3 (2018).
211 Matt Rivers, Pandemic Power Play: It’s China vs. the US in Latin America, CNN (Aug. 15 2020), https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/15/americas/latam-chinaus-covid-diplomacy-intl/index.html
212 Raquel Carvalho, China in Latin America: partner or predator, SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST (May 25, 2019), https://multimedia.scmp.com/weekasia/article/3011618/beijing-conquest-latin-america/index.html.
213 Id.
214 Id.
215 Carvalho, supra note 212.
that gringo imperialism deals with civil society, the Chinese don’t … They don’t try to understand where they are … And they consider that social peace is not their problem.”216 As Taish Mercedes, a sixty-five-year-old member of the Shuar minority, an indigenous group living in Ecuador and Peru, explained her feelings when a Chinese-backed mining project bulldozed her home in the Ecuadorean region of the Amazon basin: “[o]ur motherland can provide us with everything. That is our way of life. But the colonisers came and taught people how to live with money. … Now the Chinese are the new colonisers – just like the ones before. They are ruining the harmony of our land.”217
Washington’s repeated warning to Latin America to be wary of becoming too economically reliant on China is not having the desired effect of driving Beijing from the region.218 The reasons are fairly straightforward from a Latin-centric public-relations perspective: while the U.S. government imposed a more stringent tariff regime on Latin American countries, demanded Mexico pay for a border wall, put undocumented workers at risk for deportation, and proposed cuts to U.S. aid, China exerted itself and lent many helping hands to the region. Kevin Gallagher, a China-Latin America relations professor at Boston University, summed up the dichotomy which has practical, real-world consequences: “Literally and figuratively, the [U.S.] is building walls against Latin America . . . . The Chinese are proposing to build bridges, and they’re actually doing it.”219 Nonetheless, a Chinese long-term victory in Latin America is not inevitable. The U.S. has closer cultural, political, and economic ties with several major nations in the region than does China.220 U.S. companies, ranging from Chevron to
216 Id.
217 Id.
218 Cassandra Garrison, With U.S. Hit by Virus, China Courts Latin America with Medical Diplomacy, REUTERS (Mar. 26, 2020, 1:38 PM), https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-latam-china-featur/withu-s-hit-by-virus-china-courts-latin-america-with-medical-diplomacyidUSKBN21D346.
219 Patrick Gillespie, China Sees an Opening as Trump Loses Confidence of Latin America, CNN (Feb. 9, 2020), https://money.cnn.com/2018/02/09/news/economy/china-latin-americatrump/index.html.
220 Id.
McDonald’s, have a substantial presence and are actively collaborating with governments on myriad investment projects.221 Speaking the language of post-colonial uplift, former U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said that China’s presence in Latin America is alarming because the region “does not need new imperial powers that seek only to benefit their own people.”222 The U.S. needs to be far more adept at message branding and curtail divisive language: President Trump threatened to cut off aid to Latin America if they cannot prevent drugs from coming into the U.S., he added, quite unnecessarily “[t]hese countries are not our friends, you know.”223
C. Medical Diplomacy
During her virtual speech at the Republican National Committee, Nikki Haley, the former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, was characteristically blunt in her assessment of Beijing’s responsibility for Covid-19: “Communist China gave us the coronavirus.”224 This is not China’s first time getting blamed for its poor response to infectious diseases. During the 2002 and 2003 SARs crisis, China hid cases, censored doctors and withheld information from the world for months.225 In December 2019, patients at Wuhan hospitals had pneumonia symptoms that were not responsive to treatment. Doctors quickly sent samples for genetic testing and the results revealed a coronavirus similar to SARs; these same doctors warned the virus was contagious via respiratory
221 Id.; see also Raymond Dua Jr., The Rise of Chinese Technology in Latin America, GLOBAL AMERICANS (Aug. 12, 2020), https://theglobalamericans.org/2020/08/the-rise-of-chinese-technology-in-latinamerica/.
222 Gillespie, supra note 219.
223 Id.
224 Gavin Bade, Trump’s Tough Talk on China Faces Harsh Trade Realities, POLITICO (Aug. 27, 2020, 5:24 PM), https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/27/trump-tough-on-china-trade403890.
225 Carrie Gracie, China is Rewriting the Facts About Covid-19 to Suit its Own Narrative, THE GUARDIAN (July 27, 2020, 4:43 PM), https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jul/27/china-truthcoronavirus-panorama-xi-jinping.
droplets and on surfaces.226 Thereafter, the Chinese government stepped in. The story about a virulent infection rate was downplayed in Wuhan and Beijing. Frontline doctors tried to speak up and warn each other on social media but were silenced.227 In late December, Dr. Li Wenliang, a courageous whistleblower, was detained by the police for warning about the virus and “spreading false rumors.”228 He was forced to sign a false official statement admitting to violating the law and seriously disrupting “social order.”229 Soon after Dr. Wenliang’s death from the virus, the news of his passing was the most read topic on Weibo, China’s microblogging site with more than 1.5 billion views.230 Predictably, the intense public interest in Dr. Wenliang’s death soon caught the attention and ire of the CCP. Soon thereafter, the National Supervisory Commission, China’s most powerful anti-corruption agency issued a chilling one-sentence on their website: investigators will be sent to Wuhan to conduct “a comprehensive investigation into the problems reported by the public concerning Dr. Wenliang.231
Despite multiple layers of culpability for COVID-19, China determined its most important fight is a public relations battle.232 In the main, China’s strategy is to pivot away from stories about COVID-19’s genesis in Wuhan and the subsequent coverup perpetrated by CCP officials and promote headlines supporting that China is on the frontlines saving humanity.233 Lin Songtian, China’s ambassador to South Africa tweeted: “We are doing instead of talking. We are the friends not enemy. Could the American do the same to Chinese?”234 It is no accident that a heat map of where
226 Id.
227 Id.
228 Verna Yu, ‘Hero Who Told the Truth’: Chinese Rage Over Coronavirus Death of Whistleblower Doctor, THE GUARDIAN (Feb. 7, 2020), https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/feb/07/coronaviruschinese-rage-death-whistleblower-doctor-li-wenliang.
229Id.
230 Id.
231 Id.
232 Matthew Karnitsching, China is Winning the Coronavirus Propaganda War, POLITICO (Mar. 18, 2020), https://www.politico.eu/article/coronavirus-chinawinning-propaganda-war/.
232 Id.
234 Id.
Beijing is sending condolences and medical supplies aligns closely with nations with a demonstrated willingness to accommodate China.235 Fake news, misleading spin, obfuscation, concealment, and hyperbole are hallmarks of the CCP’s coronavirus propaganda.236 Unlike Russia, with its acrimonious information operations and election meddling, China’s global propaganda efforts are usually aimed at promoting China’s virtues.237 From Beijing’s perspective, the contest is not about who gets to run the U.S. but rather the world.238 Russia is a second-rate power in its own region. It is an economically sluggish, oil-dependent nation with an economy one tenth the size of the U.S. China, by contrast, possesses an economy poised to overtake that of the U.S. and has sunk billions of dollars into cultivating global dependence on Chinese investments and markets.139 As the global pandemic worsened, Beijing went into propaganda crisis mode. Chinese diplomats, staterun media, and Twitter influencers doubled-down and launched a frenzied defense, scrambling to preserve the CCP’s cratering reputation both domestically and internationally.140 Meanwhile, during the time China ramped up its messaging, the U.S. paused funding to the United Nations’ World Health Organization (WHO).241 U.S. allies were stunned by President Trump’s announcement.242 President Trump shot back his rationale: the WHO willingly participated in a Chinese-directed cover-up about the virus.243 As the U.S. appeared disinterested in leading a global response, China continued its ostentatious pledges of cash to the WHO and vowed to provide any vaccine discoveries China makes
235 Id.
236 Kathy Gilsinan, How China is Planning to Win Back the World, THE ATLANTIC (May 28, 2020), https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/05/china-disinformationpropaganda-united-states-xi-jinping/612085/.
237 Id.
238 Gilsinan, supra note 236.
239 Id.
240Id.
241 Alex Brandon, Trump’s WHO Cutoff Sends Officials, allies Scrambling, POLITICO (April 15, 2020), https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/15/worldhealth-organization-trump-funding-cuts-187615.
242 Id.
243 Id.
to the world as a public good.244 On July 7, 2020, President Trump started the process to withdraw the U.S. from the WHO.245 The Geneva-based organization, a leader in the fight against myriad diseases in the Americas, ranging from polio, measles to mental health issues and COVID-19, receives approximately $400 million in annual U.S. contributions.246 As the U.S. turned inward to respond to its own coronavirus crisis, “[f]rom Santiago, Chile to Mexico City and everywhere in between, America’s leadership is being called into question and China is positioning itself to carry the mantle.”247 China carefully crafted its messaging to Latin America throughout its coronavirus response and is reaping strategic returns. On April 13, 2020, Argentina’s foreign minister thanked China for providing a large shipment of much-needed medical supplies. The aid boxes were emblazoned with the Chinese and Argentine flags and a quote in Spanish about brotherhood from the renown Argentine poem “El Gaucho Martín Fierro” by José Hernández.248
Latin America became the epicenter of the pandemic during the late summer of 2020.249 Multiple leaders including Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, Honduran President Juan Hernandez, Dominican Republic President Luis Abinader, and Bolivia’s unelected de facto leader, Jeanine Añez, alongside half of her cabinet, all contracted the virus.250 The difference between the U.S. and Chinese approach to the outbreak in Latin America is striking. The U.S. suspended shipments of personal protective equipment
244 Id.
245 Shaun Tandon, Ignoring Outrage, Trump Officially Pulls US out of WHO during Virus Crisis, SCIENCE ALERT (July 8, 2020), https://www.sciencealert.com/trump-formally-starts-process-to-pull-us-out-ofwho.
246 Id.
247 Paul Angelo & Rebecca Chaves, ‘Gracias China!!!’ While the U.S. Leadership in Latin America is Being Called Into Question, Beijing is Positioning Itself to Carry the Mantle, NY TIMES (Apr. 21, 2020), https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/opinion/china-latin-america-covid.html.
248 Id.
249 Michael Paarlberg, China was Already Winning Over the US’s Beighbors. Trump’s COVID-19 Response Just Makes Beijing’s Job Easier, BUSINESS INSIDER (Aug. 27, 2020, 11:19 AM), https://www.businessinsider.com/trumpcovid-19-response-increases-chinese-influence-in-latin-america-2020-8.
250Id.
while China announced $1 billion in loans to nations in the region to help pay for a vaccine China says it will develop.251 China also donated hundreds of thousands of masks, testing kits numbering in the tens of thousands, as well as ventilators and other medical equipment.252 China’s tactics appear to be working and Brazil is a case in point. President Bolsonaro ran on an anti-China platform and blamed China for the virus’ spread. However, after Brazil faced the second worst outbreak in the world, Bolsonaro reconciled with Beijing, an about-face almost certainly spurred by Brazil’s power agribusiness interests, which know China is a customer they cannot afford to alienate.253
Beijing retained the initiative and took proactive steps each time COVID-19 swept through a new nation. From Mexico to Argentina and Peru, nations accepted China’s offers of support.254 At times, leaders even broadcasted enthusiastic and grateful messages to China. “Gracias China!!!,” gushed Mexico’s foreign minister Marcelo Ebrard on Twitter after a plane containing vital medical supplies arrived from China.255 Not one to waste a political moment, China amped up its rhetoric about brotherhood in the face of crisis. As Luo Zhaohui, a senior officer at China’s foreign ministry declared, “China will ride out the storm with people from other countries, strengthen cooperation and strive to win the last victory in the fight against the virus.”256 China’s strategic moves appear to be gaining traction. While U.S. officials were criticized for the unhelpful branding of COVID-19 as the “Chinese virus,” Beijing acknowledged the continued gratitude and praise coming from Latin America.257
Table of Contents
- I. INTRODUCTION
- II. CHINA IN CRISIS
- III. STATE-SPONSORED DOMESTIC TERROR
- IV. GREAT POWER COMPETITION
- V. COLONIALISM
- VI. CHINESE NEO-COLONIALISM
- VII. CONCLUSION - AMERICAN PROTEST, GLOBAL FREEDOM